every verdict carries its sourcere-read 2026-09-12 08:50 UTCRead API
Menu
every verdict carries its sourcere-read 2026-09-12 08:50 UTCRead API
14 builders47 sourced claims35 sources re-read33 resolving2 challenged0 broken4 ships8 with caveats1 no mobile binary1 unknown

Head to head 1 of 6 / searched as “rork vs vibecode

Rork vs Vibecode

Both records, read down the same columns. The rows the two answer differently are the rows that decide it.

Ships, with caveatsvsShips

RorkChat-to-app builder aimed squarely at the App Store.
VibecodePrompt-to-app with a documented App Store hand-off.
The verdict

Both compile React Native through Expo, so the output is not the deciding factor — the paperwork is. Vibecode documents the requirement that you hold the Apple Developer Program membership yourself, which is the arrangement 4.2.6 asks for, and ships a preflight check against the mechanical rejection causes. Rork is reported to let you export the source and push to GitHub free of charge, which matters most on the day the one-click publish fails and you need to finish the submission by hand. Pick Vibecode if you want the documented path; pick Rork if you want the escape hatch. Neither has a published record of review outcomes, and anyone claiming otherwise has not shown you one.

Column by column

The rows in brighter ink are the ones the two records answer differently.

VerdictShips, with caveatsShips
What it producesReact Native · ExpoReact Native · Expo
Can you take the sourceYesUnknown
Who submits the binaryGuided, you submitYou submit
PriceFrom $20/monthFrom $20/month
Guidelines in play4.24.2
Sourced claims44
Behind Rork

4 sourced claims.

Produces a real Expo binary and markets App Store shipping as the headline outcome, and the export path means a failed one-click publish is recoverable rather than terminal. The caveat is that the strongest claims here are the vendor’s own marketing and third-party reviews rather than a submission-record document — and the Rork Max Swift path is new enough as of August 2026 that it has no review history to read.

Rork markets App Store shipping as the product’s outcome.

"Create mobile apps by chatting with AI, ship to App Store and start making money."
Vendor marketingApp Store review/Rork — homepage/read 2026-08-01/HTTP 200

Output is React Native on Expo; Rork Max produces native Swift.

Third-party reportWhat it produces/Rork AI Review 2026 — No Code MBA/read 2026-01-01/HTTP 200

The React Native source can be exported free, including via GitHub sync when automated publishing fails.

Third-party reportSource export/Rork AI Review & Tutorial 2026 — No Code MBA/read 2026-01-01/HTTP 200

Free is design mode only; building starts at $20/mo (Pro) and iOS starts at $200/mo (Max).

"35 design credits/mo, max 5/day"
Vendor marketingPricing/Rork — Pricing/read 2026-08-15/HTTP 200
The whole Rork record
Behind Vibecode

4 sourced claims.

The clearest documented path in the catalogue. Vibecode’s own deployment page requires you to hold the $99/year Apple Developer Program membership and sign the agreements yourself, which is exactly the arrangement guideline 4.2.6 asks for — the app is submitted by the party whose content it is, not by the generator. It also ships a preflight check aimed at the mechanical rejection causes (icons, metadata, configuration).

You must hold your own Apple Developer Program membership.

"You'll need the following before submitting your app: 1. Apple Developer Program Membership ($99/year)"
Vendor documentationSubmission/Deploy to App Store — Vibecode Docs/read 2026-08-01/HTTP 200

Builds are produced by Expo Launch.

"Vibecode uses Expo Launch to start the App Store build flow."
Vendor documentationWhat it produces/Deploy to App Store — Vibecode Docs/read 2026-08-01/HTTP 200

A preflight check scans for the mechanical problems that cause Apple to reject a submission.

"common issues that could cause Apple to reject it"
Vendor documentationApp Store review/Deploy to App Store — Vibecode Docs/read 2026-08-01/HTTP 200

Plus is $20 /month and lists App Store submission — but only in a rendered browser: the served HTML carries the credit model and the billing toggle and no tier figure.

"Our pricing tiers are experimental and may evolve … $1 in credits on Vibecode = $1 in AI usage on Anthropic, OpenAI, etc."
Vendor marketingPricing/Pricing — Vibecode/read 2026-08-15/HTTP 200
The whole Vibecode record