The clearest documented path in the catalogue. Vibecode’s own deployment page requires you to hold the $99/year Apple Developer Program membership and sign the agreements yourself, which is exactly the arrangement guideline 4.2.6 asks for — the app is submitted by the party whose content it is, not by the generator. It also ships a preflight check aimed at the mechanical rejection causes (icons, metadata, configuration).
One claim, read off a document that says it.
A preflight check scans for the mechanical problems that cause Apple to reject a submission.
"common issues that could cause Apple to reject it"
One claim, read off a document that says it.
You must hold your own Apple Developer Program membership.
"You'll need the following before submitting your app: 1. Apple Developer Program Membership ($99/year)"
One claim, read off a document that says it.
Builds are produced by Expo Launch.
"Vibecode uses Expo Launch to start the App Store build flow."
One claim, read off a document that says it.
Plus is $20 /month and lists App Store submission — but only in a rendered browser: the served HTML carries the credit model and the billing toggle and no tier figure.
"Our pricing tiers are experimental and may evolve … $1 in credits on Vibecode = $1 in AI usage on Anthropic, OpenAI, etc."
Vibecode — AI App Builder
This is Vibecode’s own app, not an app built with it. Listed because the vendor clearing review for its own binary is a weak but real signal, and because mislabelling it as a customer app would be exactly the kind of error this directory exists to avoid.